نظریه های مبتنی بر تحلیل عاملی شخصیت

نظریه های مبتنی بر تحلیل عاملی شخصیت/ مدل های پنج عاملی، شش عاملی، زیستی

در فایل فعلی که بیش از ۷۰ صفحه را شامل می شود، ادبیات غنی شخصیت از منظر نظریه های مبتنی بر تحلیل عاملی و مدل های زیستی شخصیت مرور و بررسی انتقادی می شوند. منابع مورد استفاده قرار گرفته در این نوشتار برگرفته از افکار و آثار نویسندگان مطرح این حوزه تحقیق می باشد.

در زیر فهرست مطالب و منابع آورده شده اند:

فهرست مطالب

مطالعه روان واژگانی آلپورت و ادبرت………………………………………………………………………………………..

خلاصه و نتیجه‌گیری از فهرست بندی آلپورت و ادبرت……………………………………………………………………..

تحقیقات کتل در مورد شخصیت………………………………………………………………………………………………

نقد و بررسی نظریه کتل از شخصیت………………………………………………………………………………………..

پیدایش مدل‌های پنج عاملی شخصیت……………………………………………………………………………………..

آزمون پنج بزرگ در مجموعه جامعی از اصطلاحات صفات انگلیسی………………………………………………………

پنج بزرگ در پرسش‌نامه‌های شخصیت……………………………………………………………………………………..

مطالعات بین فرهنگی و بین زبانی……………………………………………………………………………………………

مطالعات اولیه فرهنگی شخصیت در زبان آلمانی و هلندی…………………………………………………………………..

نقد و بررسی مدل‌های پنج عاملی شخصیت و ظهور مدل شش عاملی شخصیت…………………………………………

نقد و بررسی مدل‌های پنج عاملی و شش عاملی شخصیت…………………………………………………………………

مدل‌های نظری و مبتنی بر تحلیل عاملی شخصیت………………………………………………………………………………

مدل‌های سلسله مراتبی شخصیت یا مدل‌های مبتنی بر تحلیل عاملی……………………………………………………….

مدل پنج عاملی شخصیت مبتنی بر نظریه کاستا و مک کری (۱۹۹۲):…………………………………………………………

پرسش‌نامه پنج بزرگ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

نشانگرهای مقیاس پنج بزرگ……………………………………………………………………………………………………

خوشه‌های مترادف گلدبرگ…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

مدل شش عاملی شخصیت (HEXACO)………………………………………………………………………………………

مدل روان رنجور خویی………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

مدل برونگرایی………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

مدل توافق پذیری…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

مدل باوجدان بودن…………………………………. ……………………………. ………………………………………………..

مدل باز بودن به تجربه‌های جدید…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

مدل صداقت- فروتنی…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

پیشینه پژوهش………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

منابع

پروین. ل. ا. و جان. ا. پ(۱۳۸۶). شخصیت(نظریه و پژوهش). برگردان محمدجعفر جوادی و پروین کدیور. تهران: آییژ.

شاملو.سعید. (۱۳۸۲). مکتب‌ها و نظریه‌ها در روانشناسی شخصیت. تهران: رشد.

اتکینسون، ریتال.ال و همکاران؛ زمینه روان‌شناسی، محمد نقی براهنی و همکاران، تهران، رشد، ۱۳۸۱، چاپ دهم، جلد دوم، ص ۸۵٫

شاملو، سعید؛ مکتب‌ها و نظریه‌ها در روان‌شناسی شخصیت، تهران، رشد، ۱۳۸۲، چاپ هفتم، ص ۱۷۴٫

جوشن لو، محسن؛ دائمی، فاطمه؛ بخشی، علی؛ ناظمی، سبا؛ غفاری، زهرا (۱۳۹۸). ساختار عاملی نسخه تجدیدنظر شده فارسي پرسشنامه شخصيتي نئو در ايران. ۲۲۰ -۲۳۰ ، مجله روان‌پزشکی و روانشناسی باليني ايران، سال شانزدهم، شماره ۳،پاييز ۱۳۸۹٫

حق‌شناس، حسن.(۱۳۸۷) . هنجاريابي آزمون نئو، فرم تجدیدنظر شده . فصلنامه .۳۸-۴۷ ،انديشه و رفتار، شماره ۱۶٫

فراهاني، محمد نقی؛ فرزاد، ولي اله؛ فتوحي، محمود. (۱۳۸۳). مطالعه لغوي عوامل شخصيت در زبان فارسي مجله روانشناسي، ۸، ۱۸ -۲۰۴٫

گروسي فرشي، مرتقی.(۱۳۸۰). رويكردهاي نوين در ارزيابي شخصيت (كاربرد تحليل عاملي در مطالعات شخصيت).تبريز:  نشر جامعه پژوه.

Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, ۱۸, ۴۴۱–۴۵۵٫

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Traitnames: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, ۴۷(۱), ۱–۱۷۱, No. 211.

Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The big seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,  ۳۰۰–۳۰۷٫

Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, E, & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, ۸۹-۱۱۸.

Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, E, & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study.  European Journal of Personality, 4, ۸۹-۱۱۸.

 Aluja, Anton; Garcı́a, Óscar; Garcı́a, Luis F. (2002). “A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50-bipolar adjectives”. Personality and Individual Differences ۳۳ (۵): ۷۱۳٫

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., de Vries, R. E., Perugini, M., Gnisci, A., & Sergi, I. (2006). The HEXACO Model of personality structure and indigenous lexical personality dimensions in Italian, Dutch, and English. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, ۸۵۱-۸۷۵.

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of  personality

European Journal of Personality, 19, 5-24.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., de Vries, R. E., Perugini, M., Gnisci, A., & Sergi, I. (in press). The HEXACO model of personality structure and indigenous lexical personality dimensions in Italian, Dutch,  and English. Journal of Research in Personality.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., de Vries, R. E., Szarota, P., Marcus, B., Wasti, S. A., et al. (2006, July). Lexical studies of personality structure: An examination of six-factor solutions. Paper presented at the 13th European Conference of Personality, Athens, Greece.

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of theHEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, ۱۵۰-۱۶۶.

Bartol & Bartol (2008). Criminal Behavior: A Psychosocial Approach. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: (8th Edition).

Benet, V., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The ‘Big Seven’ model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–۷۱۸٫

Benet-Martinez, V., & Waller, N. G. (2002). From adorable to worthless: Implicit and self-report structure of highly evaluative personality descriptors. European Journal of Personality, 16, 1–۴۱٫

Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, ۱۱۷, ۱۸۷–۲۱۵٫

Borkenau, P. (1990). Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, ۳۸۱-۳۹۶.

Botwin, M. D., & Buss, D. M. (1989). Structure of act–report data: Is the five-factor model of personality recaptured? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ۵۶, ۹۸۸–۱۰۰۱٫

Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality  (pp. 180–۲۰۸). New York: Guilford Press.

Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. A. M.  (۲۰۰۱). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, ۱۵, ۲۷۷-۲۹۵.

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five- factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.

Church, A. T., Reyes, J. A. S., Katigbak, M. S., & Grimm, S. D. (1997). Filipino personality structure and the Big Five model: A lexical approach. Journal of Personality, ۶۵, ۴۷۷-۵۲۸.

Caprara, G. V., & Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: Generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, ۸, ۳۵۷-۳۶۹.

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (NEO-PI-R) and  NEO  Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Cattell et al., 1970. R.B. Cattell, H.W. Eber and M.M. Tatsuoka , Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). , Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, Ill. (1970).

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality:  Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38,  ۴۷۶–۵۰۶٫

Church, A. T., Katibak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (1998). Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: Do the big-five or big-seven dimensions emerge? European Journal of Personality, 12, 249–۲۶۹٫

Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S. and Reyes, J. A. S. (1998). Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: do the big-seven or big-seven dimensions emerge? European Journal of Personality. Eur. J. Pers. 12: 249-269.

Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait–multimethod–multi occasion analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ۴۹, ۱۲۶۶–۱۲۸۲٫

Cloninger, C.R.; Svrakic, DM; Przybeck, TR (December 1993). “A psychobiological model of temperament and character”. Archives of General Psychiatry۵۰ (۱۲): ۹۷۵–۹۰٫

 Eysenck, H.J, &Eysenck,S.B. G  (۱۹۷۵). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, ۱۵-۲۹.

De Raad, B., Hendriks, A. A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1992).  Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6, 301–۳۱۹

De Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., &Hofstee, W. K. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality, ۲, ۸۱–۹۶٫

De Raad, B.; Al, Et; Mlačić, Boris; Church, A. Timothy; Katigbak, Marcia S.; Ostendorf, Fritz; Hřebíčková, Martina; Di Blas, Lisa; Szirmák, Zsófia (2010). “Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages: Reply to Ashton and Lee”. Journal of Research in Personality ۴۴ (۴): ۴۴۲–۴۴۵٫

De Vries, R. E.,De Vries, A.,DE HOOGH, A., FEIJ, J. (2009). More than the Big Five: Egoism and the HEXACO Model of Personality. Eur. J. Pers. 23: 635–۶۵۴٫

Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ۵۰, ۱۱۶–۱۲۳٫

Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981).  Factors in the natural language of personality:  Re-analysis and comparison of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, ۱۶, ۱۴۹–۱۷۰٫

Ding, C. S. (2006). Multidimensional scaling modelling approach to latent profile analysis in pspeychological research. International Journal of Psychology, ۴۱ (۳), ۲۲۶‐۲۳۶٫

Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, ۱۴۹-۱۷۰.

Di Blas, L. (2005). Personality-relevant attribute-nouns: A taxonomic study in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 19, 537-557.

Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12, 75-101.

De Raad, B., Hendriks, A. A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, ۶, ۳۰۱-۳۱۹.

De Raad, B., & Szirmak, Z. (1994). The search for the “Big Five” in a non–Indo-European language: The Hungarian trait structure and its relationship to the EPQ and the PTS. European Review of Applied Psychology, ۴۴, ۱۷-۲۴.

Fernald, G. G. (1920). Character vs. intelligence in personality studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, ۱۵, ۱–۱۰٫

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2,  pp. 141–۱۶۵). Beverly Hills: Sage.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, ۱۴۱-۱۶۵.

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality.  In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.),  Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1,  pp. 203–۲۳۴). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In Spielberger & Butcher (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment, 1, ۲۰۳-۲۳۴.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,  ۵۹, ۱۲۱۶-۱۲۲۹٫

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,  ۵۹, ۱۲۱۶–۱۲۲۹٫

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, ۴, ۲۶–۴۲٫

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, ۲۶-۴۲.

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits.  American Psychologist, 48, ۲۶-۳۴.

GORBANIUK, O., BUDZIŃSKA, A., OWCZAREK, M., BOŻEK, E., & JUROS, K. (2013). The Factor Structure of Polish Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: An Alternative Psycho-lexical Study. European Journal of Personality, Eur. J. Pers. 27: 304–۳۱۸٫

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “Description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.

Goldberg, L. R., & Somer, O. (2000). The hierarchical structure of common Turkish person-descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, ۱۴, ۴۹۷-۵۳۱.

Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivation of Big-Five factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69, 709-743.

Giguère, G. (2006). Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, ۲(۱), ۲۷‐۳۸٫

Hahn, D.-W., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, ۱۳, ۲۶۱-۲۸۲.

Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L.  R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ۶۳, ۱۴۶–۱۶۳٫

Hofstee, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1997). A comparison of Big- Five structures of personality traits in Dutch,  English, and German. European Journal of Personality, ۱۱, ۱۵–۳۱٫

Hogan, R. (1982). A socio-analytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page  (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1982: Personality-Current theory and research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality.  In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 55–۸۹). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Howarth, E., & Brown, J.A. (1971). Investigation of personality factors in a Canadian Context- I. Marker structure in personality questionnaire items. Can.J. behave.Sci, 161-173.

Hřebíčková, M. & Ostendorf, F. (1995). Lexikální Prístup K Osobnosti V: Klasifikace Pridavných Jmen Do Kategorií Osobnostní Deskripce [The lexical approach to personality V: classification of Czech adjectives into categories of personality description]. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 39, 265-276.

John, O. (1990). The ‘‘Big Five’’ factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality and theory research. New York: Guilford.

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Gordon Allport: Father and critic of the five-factorIn K. H. Craik, R. Hogan, & R. N. Wolfe (Eds.), Fifty years of personality psychology  (pp. 215–۲۳۶). New York: Plenum Press.

Johnston, C. S. (1995). The Rokeach value survey: underlying structure and multidimensional scaling. The Journal of Psychology. ۱۲۹(۵), ۵۸۳‐۵۹۷٫

John, OP., Goldberg, LR., Angleitner, A .(1984). Better than the Alphabet: taxonomies of personality-descriptive terms in English, Dutch, and German. Personality psychology in Europe. Bonarius H (Ed);vol.1: Theoretical and empirical developments Lisse [u.a.]: Swets & Zeitlinger: 83–۱۰۰٫

Kline and Barrett, 1983. P. Kline and P. Barrett , The factors in personality questionnaires among normal subjects. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 5 (1983), pp. 141– ۲۰۲٫

Mlacic, B., & Ostendorf, F. (2005). Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality-descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 19, 117-152.

Mugavin, M. E. (2008). Multidimensional scaling: A brief overview. Nursing Research, ۵۷(۱), ۶۴‐۶۸٫

Nicholson, I. A. M. (2003). Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood.  Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Noller, H. Law and A.L. Comrey , Cattell, Comrey and Eysenck personality factors compared: more evidence for the five robust factors?. J. Person. soc. Psychol. 53 (1987), pp. 775–۷۸۲٫

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, ۶۶, ۵۷۴–۵۸۳٫

Ohn, OP., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality 2(3): 171–۲۰۳٫

Parker, J. D. A. (1991). In search of the person:  The historical development of American personality psychology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, North York, Ontario,  Canada.

Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality- trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ۵۷, ۵۵۲–۵۶۷٫

Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America 1920–۱۹۶۰. Cambridge,  UK: Cambridge University Press.

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English rsonality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61-77.

Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 856-875.

Szirmak, Z., & De Raad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95-117.

Steyvers, M. (2002). Multidimensional scaling. In: Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Nature Publishing Group, London, UK.

Saucier, G. (1997). Effect of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296–۱۳۱۲٫

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor  model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 21–۵۰).  New York: Guilford Press.

Schuerger, J. M., Zarella, K. L., & Hotz, A. S. (1989). Factors that influence the temporal stability of personality by questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, ۷۷۷-۷۸۳٫

Simms,L.J. (2007). The Big Seven Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Pathology. Journal of Personality 75:1, 1-30.

SINGH, J.K., MISRA, G., DE RAAD, B. (2013). Personality Structure in the Trait Lexicon of Hindi, a Major Language Spoken in India. European Journal of Personality, Eur. J. Pers.

Szarota, P. (1996). Taxonomy of the Polish personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 343–۳۵۱٫

Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings.  Journal of Personality, ۶۰, ۲۲۵–۲۵۱٫ (Original work published 1961).

Tsogo, L., Masson, M. H., & Bardot, A. (2000).  Multidimensional scaling methods for many‐object sets: A review. Multivariate Behavioral Research, ۳۵(۳), ۳۰۷‐۳۱۹٫

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.

Waller, N. G., & Zavala, J. (1993). Evaluating the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 131–۱۳۴٫

Wasti, A., Lee, K., Ashton, M., Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish Personality Factors and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 39: 665-684.

Woosley, S. A., Hyman, R. E., & Graunke, S. S. (2004). Q‐sort and student affairs: A viable partnership? Journal ofCollege and Student Development, ۴۵(۲), ۲۳۱‐۲۴۲٫

Young, K. (1928). The measurement of personal and social traits. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, ۲۲, ۴۳۱–۴۴۲٫

Young, F. W., & Hamer, R. M. (1987). Multidimensional scaling: History, theory, and  applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D.M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). Acomparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, ۷۵۷-۷۶۸.

مطالعه بیشتر